Transforming Medication and Fluid Administration in Post Acute Care
A review of the practical application of rectal delivery using the Macy Catheter in hospice and palliative care
Because it can help manage severe symptoms quickly with medications already available at the bedside, agencies who use the Macy Catheter can reduce costs, mitigate staffing challenges, improve patient satisfaction/quality scores, and increase referrals.
You can skip to any section of interest:
- Medication administration challenges in hospice and palliative care
- Why hospice and palliative care providers should arm themselves with an emerging rectal delivery technology
- Identifying patients for rectal administration
- The Macy Catheter’s role in rectal medication delivery
- Medication Versatility
- A faster, safer, and more cost effective delivery alternative
Medication administration challenges in hospice and palliative care
Effective, timely, and reliable medication administration is a frequent challenge for hospice and palliative care providers.
Hospice/palliative patients typically suffer from multiple comorbidities, producing a complex web of hurdles to medication delivery. The most common administration route, oral, often becomes compromised.
Aphagia, dysphagia, and modified mental state may affect a caregiver’s ability to deliver medications orally.
Intravenous and subcutaneous administration requires more advanced and sterile technique, and may be delayed or not appropriate in the home setting. Furthermore, venous access is frequently challenged due to vein collapse, over-access, or other conditions. Additionally, venous access issues are often exacerbated by dehydration common in hospice patients and subcutaneous administration can be less effective when perfusion is reduced.
The Macy Catheter has helped thousands of hospice and palliative care patients who cannot take medications by mouth.
It is often prescribed to administer oral formulations via the rectal route. This method works as a needle-free alternative to IV and subcutaneous routes, and can mitigate shortages of injectable formulations. Clinicians have found that using the rectal route is often faster and safer than establishing IV access, and can decrease costs as well. Clinicians are also finding that it is a more effective route than sublingual, especially for patients with severe symptoms, without the risk of aspiration.
Why hospice and palliative care providers should arm themselves with an emerging rectal delivery technology
Rapid Symptom Relief
Alternatively, when the oral route is compromised, setting up for intravenous or subcutaneous delivery often requires hours or even days. Likewise, accessing specially compounded suppositories requires additional time and can be expensive.
Reduce Caregiver Burden, Empower Loved Ones
“Many times when our loved ones are disoriented and racked with pain, caregivers also are greatly, greatly affected, and we want to do the best, but sometimes we don’t know what is best. And so I’m very grateful that in my sister’s case, in Alice’s case, in our family’s case, the Macy Catheter was what would save her…”
-Geraldine W., Sibling
“From one idea—executed—many have found comfort. Thank you for the Macy Catheter Bedside Care Kit, because this kit allowed my husband of 61 years to spend his final days at home.”
-Barbara W., Spouse
Cost-Effective, Reliable Care.
Additionally, intravenous and subcutaneous drugs can often be subject to shortages and backorders. Many hospices suffered one or more shortages of important pharmaceuticals during the COVID pandemic and recent natural disasters. The adoption of a rectal catheter to administer medications already at the bedside may reduce the risk of a backorder impacting patient care and may, in some circumstances, allow for a diminished need to ration critical drugs.
Increased Operational Efficiency and Nurse Job Satisfaction
- Decrease in length and frequency of after-hours and on-call symptom burden visits (nurse with a Macy Catheter can take care of the patient with a single, shorter visit)
- Decrease in telephone triage, MD and pharmacy calls and coordination
- Decrease in disposal of parenteral medications and associated nursing time
- Increase in nurse job satisfaction stems from alleviating patients’ suffering quickly, experiencing the gratitude of family members, and self-evidently making a difference in the lives of others
Increased Quality/Satisfaction Scores and Referrals
- The more satisified family members are with the symptom control their loved ones receive, the higher they’ll rate quality and satisfaction scores
- Very dissatisfied or extremely dissatisfied patients and loved ones disproportionately impact scores. This dissatisfaction is much more likely if symptoms spiral without prompt alleviation
- Programs with high scores and grateful families yield increased referrals
Practical Rehydration
Identifying patients for rectal administration
- Severe Pain, Agitation, Nausea/Vomiting, Respiratory Distress, Seizures
- The Macy Catheter allows for continuation of important adjuvants not absorbed sublingually or available parenterally
- Prevents the risk of aspiration
The Macy Catheter’s role in rectal medication delivery
The Macy Catheter inserts easily, seats comfortably in the rectum and requires very little instruction to use. Because it does not need a sterile technique and supplies, it can be used to treat patients in place. This includes in low acuity settings such has at home or in nursing homes, and thus can prevent hospital
transfers. It can also facilitate discharge home from acute care and inpatient facilities. Because medication and hydration can continue via the Macy Catheter, patients can receive care anywhere.
Medication Versatility
A faster, safer, and more cost effective delivery alternative.
FDA cleared to provide rectal access to administer liquids/ medications.
Facilitates quick and effective symptom management.
Proven cost savings and improved nursing efficiency. Less expensive compared to IV/ SubQ routes
Easy and safe for clinicians to use. Requires minimal training.
The Macy Catheter’s role in rectal medication delivery
A recent survey of hospice nurses published in the Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing found that the Macy Catheter was more effective than sublingual administration and more comfortable than subcutaneous administration and at least as effective.
78% of those surveyed found the Macy Catheter to be more effective than sublingual medication administration.
By incorporating rectal delivery into the hospice and palliative care clinical toolkit, providers have access to a solution that better serves the patient while increasing nurse efficiency and lowering treatment cost.
Co-founder and Inventor of the Macy Catheter
2. De Boer AG, Moolenaar F, de Leede LG, Breimer DD. (1982) “Rectal drug administration: clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.” Clin Pharmacokinetics. 7(4):285–311
3. Moolenaar F, Koning B, Huizinga T. (1979) “Biopharmaceutics of rectal administration of drugs in man. Absorption rate and bioavailability of phenobarbital and its sodium salt from rectal dosage forms.” International Journal of Pharmacaceutics, 4:99–109
4. https://www.macycatheter.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Publication-PromotingExcellenceinSymptomManagementCase.pdf
5. Tortora GJ, Derrickson BH (2008) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
6. Decreasing hospital transfers in the skilled nursing setting utilizing a rectal administration catheter for treatment of changes in patient condition: https://www.macycatheter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Hospi-10124-v5.pdf
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30596459/
8. Macy Catheter: Integration and Evaluation in a Hospice Setting to Provide Symptom Relief During End-of-Life Care. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 24(6), 689–693. https://doi.org/10.1188/20.cjon.689-693
9. A Cost and Quality Analysis of Utilizing a Rectal Catheter for Medication Administration in End-ofLife Symptom Management: https://www.macycatheter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ACostAndQualityAnalysis.pdf
10. Ref 994 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Vol. 51 No. 6 June 2016 Pharmacokinetics of Phenobarbital in Microenema Via Macy Catheter Versus Suppository, Y. W. Francis Lam, PharmD, FCCP, Ansom Lam, MD, and Brad Macy, RN, BSN, BA, CHPN
Have a question we didn’t answer?
Contact us! Hospi’s team of licensed clinical professionals will get back to you within 2 business days.